Efforts to Improve the Professionalism of Lecturers' Teaching Through Monitoring and Evaluation of Learning in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program at Idia Prenduan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65118/alim.v2i2.47Keywords:
Lecturer Professionalism, Monitoring And Evaluation, Islamic Education, Quality Assurance, Islamic Boarding School Values.Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of the monitoring and evaluation (monev) system in improving lecturer professionalism in the Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Study Program at IDIA Prenduan. Using a qualitative approach and case study method, this study analyzed data from in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document review with four key informants. The research findings indicate that the SIMASTER-based monev system successfully increased lecturer compliance with the RPS by 22% (from 65% in 2020 to 87% in 2023), while encouraging 45% of lecturers to adopt active learning methods. However, the implementation of this system faced obstacles in the form of technological resistance from 23% of senior lecturers and negative perceptions of student evaluations (30% of respondents). The uniqueness of this study lies in the integration of Islamic boarding school values (al-muhasabah and tazkiyatun nafs) which were proven to be effective in increasing lecturer acceptance of the evaluation process (85% of respondents). This study recommends the development of an integrated monitoring and evaluation model that combines a technocratic approach with the distinctive values of Islamic boarding schools, intensive training for senior lecturers, and the refinement of evaluation instruments based on 360-degree feedback. These findings provide an important contribution to the development of a quality assurance system in religious higher education institutions with a distinctive cultural approach.
References
Asep Supriyadi, M. Ryan Fauzi, Shafwa Imala, & Yasmi Nur Almi Permadi. (2025). Teacher Performance Assessment in Improving Professionalism and Learning Quality. Kasyafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.61166/kasyafa.v2i2.84
Wiyono, Mardi. “Profesionalisme Dosen Dalam Program Penjaminan Mutu.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol.2, no. 1 (Februari 2009).
Suheri, Agus. “Sistem Monitoring Kinerja Dosen Dalam Kegiatan Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kasus STMIK Cilegon).” Media Jurnal Informatika, vol.9, no. 1 (Juni 2017).
Ristanti, “DIGITALISASI PERENCANAAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI MADRASAH”. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. 2023
Agusta, Ivanovich. Teknik Pengumpulan dan Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Litbang Pertanian, 2012.
Arikanto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2006.
Dudung, Agus. “Kompetensi Profesional Guru.” Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga dan Pendidikan, vol.5, no. 1 (2018): 9–19.
Helmi, Jhon. “Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru.” Jurnal Pendidikan, vol.7, no. 2 (2015): 318–336.
Ibnudin, & Akhmad Syatori. (2023). Professionalism Of Islamic Religious Education Teachers. Al-Fadlan: Journal of Islamic Education and Teaching, 1(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.61166/fadlan.v1i1.5
Idris. “Kajian Kebijakan Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru dan Dosen di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol.3, no. 2 (November 2020).
Jusmawati, dan Eka Fitriana. Manajemen Kelas “Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru.” Banten: CV. AA RIZKY, 2019.
Koswara, Deni. “Implikasi Monitoring dan Evaluasi Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Sekolah.” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, vol.3, no. 1 (2005).
Maura Aulia Mardatila, & Rusdiana Navlia. (2026). Implementation of a Multicultural Approach in the Evaluation of Educational Programs at MAN 2 Pamekasan School. Beginner: Journal of Teaching and Education Management, 3(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.61166/bgn.v3i2.106
Mimi, Hariyani. “Analisis Kompetensi Profesional Dosen Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.” Jurnal Pesona Dasar, vol.1, no. 5 (April 2017): 17.
Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
Muhson, Ali. “Meningkatkan Profrsionalisme Guru: Sebuah Harapan.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, vol.2, no. 1 (Agustus): 90–98.
Mustofa, M. Lutfi. Monitoring dan Evaluasi. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2012.
Poltak Sinambela, Lijan. “Profesionalisme Dosen dan Kualitas Pendidikan Tinggi.” Jurnal Populis, vol.2, no. 4 (Desember 2017).
Prof. Dr. rer.net. Asrial, M. Si. Pedoman Proses Pembelajaran Monitoring dan Evaluasi. Jambi: Unja, 2017.
Pulungan, Ismail. “Manajemen Mutu Terpadu, PAU untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Instruksional.” Depdiknas, 2003.
Ramayulis, dan Samsul Nizhar. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam: Telaah Sistem Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Para Tokohnya. Jakarta: Kalam Mulia, 2009.
Republik Indonesia. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi, 2012.
———. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen, 2005.
Saud. Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
Setya Ningrum, Isa, dan Seprini. “Strategi Meningkatkan Kompetensi Dosen Universitas Pasir Pengaraian Melalui Pendidikan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos, vol.3, no. 2 (Juli 2014): 118.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. Pengelolaan Kelas dan Siswa: Sebuah Pendekatan Evaluatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
Sukari, Wita Yulianti, dan Liza Tisnawati. “Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi Sebagai Implementasi Penjaminan Mutu Internal Dengan Laravel dan Rapid Application Development (RAD).” Jurnal JOISIE, vol.4, no. 2 (Desember 2020).
Tahrir. “Pengaruh Kompetensi Dosen Terhadap Motivasi belajar pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi UIN.” Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, vol.1, no. 1 (2013): 757.
Uzer Usman, Moh. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
Wijaya, C A. “Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Pengelolaan Program Studi di Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi.” Indonesia Journal of Information System, vol.1, no. 1 (2018).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmadi Ahmadi, Wintang Irawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 